<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruiz-Ade.com &#187; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ruiz-ade.com/category/tech/software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ruiz-ade.com</link>
	<description>Living life so you don't have to.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 06:07:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dear Adobe Reader Safari Plugin: Die.</title>
		<link>http://ruiz-ade.com/2010/04/23/dear-adobe-reader-safari-plugin-die/</link>
		<comments>http://ruiz-ade.com/2010/04/23/dear-adobe-reader-safari-plugin-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Ruiz-Ade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acrobat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launchd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruiz-ade.com/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re anything like me, you have a strong dislike for all the stupidity that surrounds the Adobe Reader (formerly known as Acrobat Reader.)
I won&#8217;t go into the details here (though this guy can explain it in great detail), but because I very occasionally need features of Adobe Reader, I still keep it installed on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re anything like me, you have a strong dislike for all the stupidity that surrounds the Adobe Reader (formerly known as Acrobat Reader.)</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go into the details here (though <a href="http://www.bynkii.com/">this guy</a> can explain it in great detail), but because I <em>very occasionally</em> need features of Adobe Reader, I still keep it installed on my Mac, while I use Preview for all my other PDF needs.  I&#8217;ve gone so far as to install the <a href="http://code.google.com/p/firefox-mac-pdf/">Firefox PDF Plugin for Mac</a> for when I use Firefox, <strong>just to avoid Adobe Reader</strong>.  And, really, there&#8217;s no point in Adobe Reader for most cases where you just want to be able to view or print PDF files.  Doubly so, since Mac OS X lets you print any document to a PDF file as a default feature of the OS.</p>
<p>There are, though, edge cases where having Adobe Reader installed and available are useful.  So I have it installed, but I refuse to use their web plugin.  Adobe doesn&#8217;t care, though, and will periodically, sometimes randomly, and sometimes even without my consent, <em>re-install the plugin.</em>  Even though I&#8217;ve told it not to.  Adobe Updater, I&#8217;m looking at you, here.</p>
<p>Sadly, my solution is heavy-handed.  I created a launchd task that will forcibly remove the Adobe Reader plugin from /Library/Internet Plugins whenever it&#8217;s created.  It&#8217;s fast, efficient, and works.</p>
<p>And, as soon as I can figure out the new wordpress theme, I&#8217;ll post it here in a legible form</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Thanks to <a href="https://twitter.com/LynneAndChad">Lynne and Chad</a> on <a href="https://twitter.com/">Twitter</a> for suggesting the <a href="http://coffee2code.com/wp-plugins/preserve-code-formatting/">Preserve Code Formatting</a> plugin!</p>
<p>And now, the Launchd config. Save this as:<br />
<code>&quot;/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.unnerving.RemoveAdobeReaderPlugin.plist&quot;</code></p>
<hr />
<div class="code">
<pre><code>&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;
&lt;!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC &quot;-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd&quot;&gt;
&lt;plist version=&quot;1.0&quot;&gt;
&lt;dict&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;key&gt;Label&lt;/key&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;string&gt;org.unnering.RemoveAdobeReaderPlugin&lt;/string&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;key&gt;ProgramArguments&lt;/key&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;array&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;string&gt;rm&lt;/string&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;string&gt;-rf&lt;/string&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;string&gt;/Library/Internet Plug-Ins/AdobePDFViewer.plugin&lt;/string&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;/array&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;key&gt;QueueDirectories&lt;/key&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;array&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;string&gt;/Library/Internet Plug-Ins/AdobePDFViewer.plugin&lt;/string&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;/array&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;key&gt;WatchPaths&lt;/key&gt;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;array/&gt;
&lt;/dict&gt;
&lt;/plist&gt;
</code></pre></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ruiz-ade.com/2010/04/23/dear-adobe-reader-safari-plugin-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs are not for busy people</title>
		<link>http://ruiz-ade.com/2009/09/06/blogs-are-not-for-busy-people/</link>
		<comments>http://ruiz-ade.com/2009/09/06/blogs-are-not-for-busy-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Ruiz-Ade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruiz-ade.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently weblogs are not for busy people, who don&#8217;t have time to write for them more than once a quarter.  It would also help if I perhaps didn&#8217;t use a weblog engine that required upgrading every month because of new security holes.
Bleh.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently weblogs are not for busy people, who don&#8217;t have time to write for them more than once a quarter.  It would also help if I perhaps didn&#8217;t use a weblog engine that required upgrading every month because of new security holes.</p>
<p>Bleh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ruiz-ade.com/2009/09/06/blogs-are-not-for-busy-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Photo Archiving</title>
		<link>http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/10/16/digital-photo-archiving/</link>
		<comments>http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/10/16/digital-photo-archiving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Ruiz-Ade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruiz-ade.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear LazyWeb:
My wife and I have something like 4000+ photos that we need to scan (at high resolution) and archive, and be able to logically manage.
My platform choice is Mac.  I will likely be purchasing a Mac Mini to dedicate to this task (2GHz model).  I do not want to afford a Mac [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear LazyWeb:</p>
<p>My wife and I have something like 4000+ photos that we need to scan (at high resolution) and archive, and be able to logically manage.</p>
<p>My platform choice is Mac.  I will likely be purchasing a Mac Mini to dedicate to this task (2GHz model).  I do not want to afford a Mac Pro, as awesome as it would be to have such a powerhouse in my home.  I already have an Epson 2400 scanner, and would prefer to not have to replace it.</p>
<p>I have no idea what software to use for the resulting photo collection.  I&#8217;d like something better than simple files on the disk, and am considering either Lightroom or Aperture, even both of those seem aimed more directly at digital photography.</p>
<p>I would like a simple workflow, if possible, that doesn&#8217;t rely on me naming the images.  Tagging and notes/comments would be required.</p>
<p>Can I get away with Lightroom or Aperture, and whatever scanner software I can install for my scanner?  Do I need something different?</p>
<p>Can Lightroom or Aperture store images on an external disk (which may not always be connected?)  I&#8217;ve got plenty of storage already on my home network.</p>
<p><b>UPDATE:</b></p>
<p>Hardware will likely end up being a new 13&#8243; MacBook, instead of a Mac Mini, as my wife needs a replacement for her iBook anyway, and the new MacBook has way more power than the mini.  This definitely necessitates the ability to store all the images on external storage, ideally via a network (SMB/CIFS) share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/10/16/digital-photo-archiving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh… Safari was already awesome.</title>
		<link>http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/06/18/oh%e2%80%a6-safari-was-already-awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/06/18/oh%e2%80%a6-safari-was-already-awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Ruiz-Ade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruiz-ade.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, yeah, this is probably old news to everyone else, but I&#8217;m late to the party, as usual. I finally tripped over two menu options in the History menu of Safari that I had not previously noticed.
The first is &#8220;Reopen Last Closed Window.&#8221;  This is very useful.
The second is &#8220;Reopen All Windows From Last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, yeah, this is probably old news to everyone else, but I&#8217;m late to the party, as usual. I finally tripped over two menu options in the History menu of Safari that I had not previously noticed.</p>
<p>The first is &#8220;Reopen Last Closed Window.&#8221;  This is very useful.</p>
<p>The second is &#8220;Reopen All Windows From Last Session.&#8221;  This takes care of my biggest concern regarding session restore.</p>
<p>So I guess maybe a &#8220;Reopen Last Closed Tab&#8221; option might be about all I could add to that to be truly complete.</p>
<p>I do still look with great envy at Firefox&#8217;s extensions system, particularly for <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865">Adblock Plus</a>, <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433">FlashBlock</a> and <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/722">NoScript</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/06/18/oh%e2%80%a6-safari-was-already-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safari: You&#8217;re Awesome, But You Could Be More Awesome</title>
		<link>http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/03/31/safari-youre-awesome-but-you-could-be-more-awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/03/31/safari-youre-awesome-but-you-could-be-more-awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Ruiz-Ade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/03/31/safari-youre-awesome-but-you-could-be-more-awesome/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been about a week and a half since Apple release the last batch of updates for OS X, including the latest version of Safari.  In the interests of keeping up to date with security updates, I went ahead and updated.  I did my research first, though, and uninstalled Saft before the attempt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been about a week and a half since Apple release the last batch of updates for OS X, including the latest version of Safari.  In the interests of keeping up to date with security updates, I went ahead and updated.  I did my research first, though, and uninstalled <a href="http://haoli.dnsalias.com/Saft/">Saft</a> before the attempt (there were some who had problems with InputManagers installed during the upgrade.)</p>
<p>I was happy to discover, this evening, that Saft had been updated to support the latest version of Safari.  Despite my general revulsion for running InputManager-based hacks (let alone other system behavior modification software, like <a href="http://www.unsanity.com/">Haxies</a>, that hook in even deeper to the system), Saft offers a subset of functionality that I simply don&#8217;t like doing without.  A couple of the features, I feel, really should be integrated into Safari proper.</p>
<p><span id="more-15"></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve <a href="http://method.unnerving.org/2008/03/19/safari-session-saving/">already mentioned</a> my strong desire for one of the features, session saving and restoring.  Firefox has this nailed, and it&#8217;s a built-in feature.  I feel strongly enough about it to mention it again here.  Hey, Apple, are you listening?  I want full session-saving, like what Saft does now, built into Safari.</p>
<p>Another feature Saft gives me is (rudimentary) ad blocking.  The various Firefox extensions (namely <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865">Adblock Plus</a>) that exist give tremendous power in blocking ads on the web pages you view.  I don&#8217;t know that Saft will ever approach the power of something like Adblock Plus, but it does a good enough job for the moment.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a question worth investigating: Is it possible to write an Adblock Plus-like Safari plug-in using the official Internet Plugins API?  My understanding is that API is restricted to the content of the page, and doesn&#8217;t allow for any behavior modification of Safari itself.  That should be enough, right?  This is something I&#8217;ll have to investigate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d definitely like to stop having to install InputManager-based hacks on my system, though.  Safari is, in my opinion, an excellent browser, but the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.  Firefox does seem to have a mighty green lawn around their extensions garden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ruiz-ade.com/2008/03/31/safari-youre-awesome-but-you-could-be-more-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
